Likely AI-generated. Pangram flags 100% of this text as AI-written.
1
Independent cryptographic review of PRML
ProposalGrant
Closes October 10th, 2026$0raised
$4,500minimum funding
$6,000funding goal
Offer to donate
30 daysleft to contribute
You're pledging to donate if the project hits its minimum goal and gets approved. If not, your funds will be returned.
Project summary
PRML small open spec I start for AI evaluations. Idea simple. Before result come, you record criteria and hash it. Later other person check same criteria object was already there that time, not changed after.
I write four implementations myself, Python JavaScript Go Rust. This is problem also. If all four same, still one person work. I need someone outside check the parts people have to trust.
What are this project's goals? How will you achieve them?
I want independent cryptographic and security review. Person who never work on PRML.
Reviewer should try break canonical serialization, registry worker and sealed commitment. Not only read code and say okay looks good.
After I publish report. If they find big problem I publish that also and I fix. Find problem is not fail for me. This is why I want review now.
How will this funding be used?
2500 dollar for canonical serialization. Can two implementations make different bytes for same criteria object? Negative tests catch parser difference or not? This is the question.
2000 dollar for registry worker. This part privileged, it sign receipts.
1500 dollar for sealed commitment. Can one commitment open as different criteria object? I want they check this.
If I get only 4500 I do first two. Sealed commitment later.
Who is on your team? What's your track record on similar projects?
team is me only now.
I write specification and four implementations. Same 21 conformance vectors and 20 negative cases. All four should reject same.
I build also public registry and some integrations. UK AISI Inspect one of them. IANA register PRML media type 3 September 2026.
Code and spec public. Reviewer can look real thing, not only idea.4
What are the most likely causes and outcomes if this project fails?
Maybe I dont find good reviewer with this money or work bigger than I think then I cut scope. I will not say 6000 dollar cover all.
Or review stay shallow, just reading, not trying break. I dont want that. I want person who try break assumptions.
Bigger problem, review finish, system technically okay, but still nobody use PRML except me. Report still useful, public, but adoption stay same problem.
How much money have you raised in the last 12 months, and from where?
0 dollar.
I pay myself since April 2026.