Hi everyone — I’ve added a supplementary stress-test section to the proposal.
If anyone is interested in reviewing the raw data or reproducing the experiments, I’m happy to share:

• ZTGI-Pro v6 hazard logs (σ, ε, H, H*, r, p_break, SAFE/WARN/BREAK)

• the CCR prompt sets (stable, contradiction, paradox)

• the multi-observer paradox case where ZTGI triggered a full BREAK (Ω = 1)

• the parallel subjective FPS-collapse report produced independently by Gemini

I’m also open to providing full telemetry screenshots or JSON traces upon request.
All tests were run locally on a LLaMA backend with ZTGI-Shield active, and I can share exact configuration details if needed.

If you want to review or audit the results, feel free to ask — I’ll gladly upload any of the logs.

The ZTGI-V5 Book (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17670650) contains the full theoretical background behind the hazard signal and Single-FPS interpretation.
This proposal focuses only on v3.3, the minimum operational concept — not consciousness claims or broad theory.
Happy to provide an even more minimal working example if needed.

Hi everyone — Furkan here.

Thanks for taking the time to look at this project.
Just to add a bit of context:

• I’m a single-person independent researcher.

• Everything here — the theory, prototype, math, demo and two Zenodo DOIs — was built from scratch.

• The core idea is narrow on purpose: “Can a single scalar hazard signal give us useful information about internal instability in an LLM’s short reasoning loop?”

If reviewers have any questions, technical or conceptual, I’m very happy to answer them.
I can also share:

• live demo access (desktop),

• additional stress-test data,

• full ZTGI-V5 manuscript (DOI above).

Thanks again for considering this small exploratory project —
even negative results could help clarify whether this direction is worth deeper investigation.

— Furkan