@charbel-raphael Sure thing! Thanks for the note!
@Ahmed
Independent AI Researcher
https://www.linkedin.com/in/ahmedeldaw/$100 in pending offers
Ahmed
6 days ago
@MarcusAbramovitch thanks for the pointer, I dug into Ozzie's work properly. I think we're solving different problems. His own vision doc (https://www.longtermwiki.com/wiki/E883) calls LongtermWiki "a strategic intelligence platform for AI safety prioritization" for funders and researchers asking "where should the next dollar or researcher-hour go", built around cruxes, worldviews and intervention rankings. People and orgs are minor background entities there, and he lists "community features" as a non-goal.
Connecting and matching people is exactly that, and it's the core of ATLAS: the point is the people, and getting them fast to what they need, a hire, a collaborator, a talk, funding. So I see them as complementary rather than the same thing, his data could even feed mine. I've emailed Ozzie to figure out how we can collaborate. Curious where you see the line between the two.
Ahmed
8 days ago
I've been thinking about where this goes after the directory is solid and wanted to share it here.
The bigger goal is to make ATLAS the matching layer for the field, not just a place to browse:
For hiring: a lab or recruiter posts a role and gets a ranked shortlist of people who actually fit, instead of searching. Same for new labs/startups that just want newcomers or fresh people in the field, we surface them. And the reverse, a person sees the orgs and roles that fit them.
For projects: match projects with collaborators and with funders.
Richer profiles: using the scraper, show real signal on each profile, publications and their actual work and links, so labs can see who they're looking for.
The part I'm most interested in, but it only works with the labs: a portable candidate signal. Right now, every lab runs its own screening and work tests, and every candidate redoes them from scratch. If labs want to co-design or share an assessment that lives here, ATLAS could be the top of the funnel, a candidate does it once, gets feedback on what to work on, and the lab gets a shortlist of aligned people, recently validated. The hard part is labs trusting the signal, so this is more an invitation to labs than something I build alone, and it comes after the directory is solid.
For funding: Surface fundable people and projects to funders based on their real record, to feed existing funders like Manifund.
All of this is stage two, on top of the funded plan. Curious if any of it is useful, and whether any labs or funders would want to be part of it.
Ahmed
8 days ago
I've been thinking about where this goes after the directory is solid and wanted to share it here.
The bigger goal is to make ATLAS the matching layer for the field, not just a place to browse:
For hiring: a lab or recruiter posts a role and gets a ranked shortlist of people who actually fit, instead of searching. Same for new labs/startups that just want newcomers or fresh people in the field, we surface them. And the reverse, a person sees the orgs and roles that fit them.
For projects: match projects with collaborators and with funders.
Richer profiles: using the scraper, show real signal on each profile, publications and their actual work and links, so labs can see who they're looking for.
The part I'm most interested in, but it only works with the labs: a portable candidate signal. Right now, every lab runs its own screening and work tests, and every candidate redoes them from scratch. If labs want to co-design or share an assessment that lives here, ATLAS could be the top of the funnel, a candidate does it once, gets feedback on what to work on, and the lab gets a shortlist of aligned people, recently validated. The hard part is labs trusting the signal, so this is more an invitation to labs than something I build alone, and it comes after the directory is solid.
For funding: Surface fundable people and projects to funders based on their real record, to feed existing funders like Manifund.
All of this is stage two, on top of the funded plan. Curious if any of it is useful, and whether any labs or funders would want to be part of it.
Ahmed
16 days ago
Hi @Austin, I thought you might be interested to check this out: http://aisa.nahdha.tech -- I welcome feedback!
| For | Date | Type | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ahmed | 1 day ago | cash to charity transfer | 100 |
| AI Safety Roster: a searchable directory of everyone in AI safety | 4 days ago | project donation | +4000 |