
Manifold is putting up $30k in prizes for community work done over the next 3 months. And you can invest $ or mana into the success of these projects, via impact certs!
A founder posts their project on Manifund. It starts in the “proposal” stage.
Investors have the opportunity to buy up equity in the project at a valuation that covers the minimum funding specified by the creator.
If the project gets enough investor buy-in to cover minimum costs, the project will move into the “active” stage. An automated markets maker will be seeded, allowing investors to trade on the certificate at any time, or for the founder to sell more equity for more funding.
If a project does not receive sufficient funding, but they ship the project anyway, they will still be eligible for retroactive payouts.
Throughout the three months, project founders post updates on their progress, allowing investors and the Manifold team to evaluate their projects and trade accordingly.
Once per month, around the payout dates ****(Dec 15, Jan 15, & Feb 15), Manifold will evaluate all projects and award prizes.
The prize will be in the form of a buy offer on certificates, which sets a price floor. Investors and founders can sell against this floor, or wait for a better offer in a future round. See Vitalik’s explainer on how this works:
For more background on impact certs, see Manifund’s explainer and the last ACX round.
Reward sustained contributions by community folks
Encourage new, high-quality projects to legitimize PMs
Discover grassroots ways to promote and grow Manifold
Find people we may want to hire in the future
Test out impact certs & set up a robust cert ecosystem
Soon: creators can start submitting project proposals through Manifund
Each project must specify a min funding amount of at least $100
Soon: anyone can invest $ or mana into these proposals on Manifund
As a bonus, we’ll give core team & Trustworthyish users $100 to invest
Throughout the next 3 months: creators work on their projects and post updates
Investors can continue trading the certs based on how they think the projects are doing
Prize payouts (Dec 15, Jan 15, Feb 15): We’ll award up to $10k in prizes for impactful community work
Prizes are in $ for project creators, and mana for investors of winning projects
The Manifold team will be deciding the prize amounts based on perceived value to the Manifold company
Exact methodology TBD, probably using the Manifund retro eval algorithm we’ve developed weighing inside-view estimate & confidence
But eg could be quadratic vote or median of evals (like in ACX Minigrants)
Ideas are cheap, execution is everything!
We’ll award prizes based on the quality of the output, not on how good the idea was
Each payout aims to assess impact realized between each checkpoint
For example: if someone starts a great podcast on Jan 1 2024, they might earn $1k for 2 episodes before Jan 15, and then $2k for 4 new episodes before Feb 15.
Existing projects are eligible — you can create impact certs for these and offer to sell them!
We reserve the right to update prizes and structure of the fund
If we don’t get enough good projects in Nov, we might eg only spend $5k and then distribute more in Dec/Jan
(Warning: very fuzzy, these are not authoritative or guaranteed)
Manifold would be happy to pay $2 per real user signup
(with perhaps some threshold for transaction costs, eg minimum 25 new users)
Or $50 per notable user (eg 100k+ Twitter followers) who creates & shares a market, or someone who is Trustworthy-ish quality
$300 for a high-quality blog post promoting Manifold
eg one that gets cited by some reputable external source, like the WvM writeup
(we’re generally very open to guest posts)
$100 for software eng work that we like and would have taken a core team member 1 hour
(warning: due to onboarding and switching costs, a good SWE might expect to take 2-10x as long as one of our own team members)
Don’t Goodhart on these too much, though!
Austin thinks the best projects come from people who want to do something awesome, and we’ll reward projects even if they don’t fit in a neat bucket
Feel free to ask about other kinds of metrics or evaluations
Q: As a creator, how much effort should I expect to put into my project?
Expect to put in 10h+ for a particular project!
Q: What’s the relation between “$”, “mana” and “Manifund balance”?
Roughly:
Q: Should someone with lots of projects create a single entry for themselves? or per project?
Lean towards one “umbrella project” for you, instead of many mini projects. (We also encourage you to form teams!)
Q: Do I have to offer to sell some of my equity to be eligible for the prize?
Yes, at least enough to seed the impact cert AMM on Manifund. Part of the goal of the round is to test impact certs.
Projects that didn’t hit their minimum funding bar on Manifund, but actually executed, will still be eligible for prizes.
Q: Does my project have to pertain specifically to Manifold?
Not necessarily. For example, a widely-read blog post about using prediction markets within your startup would be eligible for funding, if we think the knock-off effects on the forecasting ecosystem and thus Manifold are good.
Here’s a flavor of the kinds of projects we’d be excited to see!
Organize & moderate debates that incorporate live-betting on markets
Host a weekly call on Discord to welcome new Manifold users and help them get oriented
An Actually Good podcast series interviewing top users and team members
Run a Manifold game night at your local rationality meetup and posting a writeup (like this)
Build a good matching algorithm for pairs of profiles on manifold.love
Host a premier prediction market tournament on the Israel vs Hamas conflict
Publish a daily short Substack on interesting happenings in the world of forecasting (cf Matt Levine)
Set up an unofficial Manifold swag store using printful and DallE art
Produce 5 short YouTube videos on “Getting Started on Manifold”
Creating a popular website or mobile app that wraps Manifold, using our API
Incorporating prediction markets into a livestream of chess gameplay on Twitch or Discord
Analyze the forecasting track record of various prediction market platforms, polls, pundits, etc.
Use https://github.com/vluzko/manifoldpy to answer questions like: What is the relationship between liquidity vs calibration
Build an OpenAI assistant for Manifold
Market Manifold or Manifold.love online or in person and get many users to signup
Major contributions to Manifold’s growth:
Scott Alexander’s “Mantic Mondays”
QuantumObserver’s LK99 market
Memestiny’s Destiny Orbiter stocks
Mira’s GPT4 market: This was a cool way to showcase prediction markets as a crowdsourced challenge. Mira put in a lot of effort into setting up good criteria and verifying the outputs, and the market got super popular (hitting #1 on Hacker News)
JSKF’s mirror bot: Lots of people have suggested mirroring more markets between Manifold and other prediction sites, but JSKF sat down and figured out all the logistics in doing so, just by using our managram API in a clever way.
Isaac King’s search dashboard: Our search functions can be somewhat lacking at helping you find exactly that market that you were looking for. Isaak saw this problem, and built out a third-party search utility using our API, which gets regularly used by Manifold community members.
WasabiPesto’s Calibration City: A big bottleneck to wider adoption of prediction markets is, “can we trust these things at all?” WasabiPesto built a very configurable site to answer that very question, letting people understand when prediction markets are calibrated.
Tobias’s playing cards: A beautiful example of custom art made for the Manifold community, which draws on the lore of prediction markets, stock trading, and forecasting and turns them into cute on-brand animals. We relied on these as the awesomest swag we had at the Manifest conference!
Marketwise blog: Marketwise explores a variety of topics that are interesting to the Manifold community, on a regular cadence. One of his posts, on the benefits of boosting vs subsidy, was well-researched and served as the impetus for Stephen to simplify the boosting system!
Market Manipulation Podcast: This was originally a joke by Conflux, but got more and more elaborate over time… until it morphed into a serious effort at producing good episodes! Bonus points for the
Eliza’s moderation practices: Eliza is our most active moderator by far, and has spent countless hours resolving minutiae on so many markets and weighing in on Discord. (Sometimes I wonder if she’s secretly a front for an entire team of users. Or a robot.)
Jack’s 2022 midterms prediction market performance analysis: The accuracy of prediction markets vs prediction polls is a longstanding one, and Jack attacked this question directly using on a highly-traded and socially valuable dataset.
See also the Community Bounties we’ve historically paid out!
Feel free to leave thoughts as comments on this doc or on Discord!