@Emmanuel-king, yes. Risk communication for public preparedness should not be isolated from other interventions and pursuits such as broader AI safety pursuits, AI governance, and even AI-related policymaking.

@CJSmith, I don't disagree with the premise. However, I'd say it still boils down to a lack of risk communication for public preparedness. Ideally, AI risk communication should be such that also provides transparent information regarding AI capabilities, since the capabilities form a part of the risk factors (although other elements such as misalignment would still need to be tied into the equation).

@Emmanuel-king, thank you for the support.